policeman: wear belts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38
, young man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear belts 1.00
have rose belts 0.83
wear hats 0.82
wear different hats 0.81
wear black 0.80
wear uniforms 0.80
wear helmets 0.80
wear blue 0.78
wear masks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(policeman, wear belts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(policeman, wear belts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(police, wear blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(police, wear blue)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear blue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(police, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear belts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, wear black)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear black)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(police officer, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(policeman, wear belts)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(policeman, have rose belts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(policeman, have rose belts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(policeman, wear hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(policeman, wear different hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear different hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(policeman, have rose belts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(policeman, wear black)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear different hats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(policeman, wear black)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(policeman, wear helmets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(policeman, wear helmets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(policeman, wear masks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(policeman, wear blue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear masks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(policeman, wear blue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear black)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear helmets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear masks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear blue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear different hats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(policeman, have rose belts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear blue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear masks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear helmets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(policeman, wear belts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(police, wear blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(police officer, wear blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(policeman, wear belts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(police, wear blue)