policy: affect aggregate demand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect aggregate demand 1.00
influence aggregate demand 0.95
affect demand 0.85
influence demand 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(policy, affect aggregate demand)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(policy, influence aggregate demand)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(policy, influence aggregate demand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(policy, affect demand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(policy, influence aggregate demand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(policy, influence aggregate demand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(policy, influence demand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(policy, influence demand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(policy, affect demand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(policy, affect demand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(policy, affect demand)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(policy, influence demand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(policy, influence demand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(policy, affect aggregate demand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(policy, affect aggregate demand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(policy, affect aggregate demand)