policy: be ineffective in liquidity trap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ineffective in liquidity trap 1.00
is procyclical 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be ineffective in liquidity trap)