policy: fail in nigeria

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in nigeria 1.00
america today 0.76
be high in argentina 0.75
be in gujarat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, be in gujarat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be high in argentina)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(prohibition, be in gujarat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(prohibition, be in gujarat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(interest rate, be high in argentina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be high in argentina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(policy, fail in nigeria)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(policy, america today)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(policy, america today)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(policy, america today)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(policy, america today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(policy, fail in nigeria)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(prohibition, be in gujarat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(interest rate, be high in argentina)