policy: is xp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is xp 1.00
xp 1.00
become in canada 0.76
be low in australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be low in australia)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bill, become in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(interest rate, be low in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be low in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(policy, is xp)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(policy, xp)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(policy, xp)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(policy, xp)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(policy, xp)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, is xp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bill, become in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(interest rate, be low in australia)