politics: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sphere
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.65
, realm
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings culture
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, rhetoric
Weight: 0.34
, grey matter
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
be science 0.94
is science 0.93
ignore science 0.84
be called master science 0.83
be considered art 0.79
be interrelated to political science 0.79
be studied scientifically 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(theology, is science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(politics, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(politics, is science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(politics, be science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(politics, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(politics, be called master science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(politics, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(politics, be considered art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(politics, be science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(politics, be studied scientifically)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(politics, be science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(politics, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(politics, be science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(politics, be interrelated to political science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(politics, be considered art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(politics, be studied scientifically)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(politics, be considered art)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(politics, be studied scientifically)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(politics, be interrelated to political science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(politics, be studied scientifically)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(politics, be interrelated to political science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(politics, be interrelated to political science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(politics, be called master science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(politics, be called master science)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(politics, be called master science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(politics, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)