politics: be control by big money

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sphere
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, movement
Weight: 0.62
Siblings political party
Weight: 0.36
, culture
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, religion
Weight: 0.34
, nationalism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be control by big money 1.00
be control by money 0.94
be control 0.85
be used to keep population in control 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(religion, be control)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(religion, be used to keep population in control)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(religion, be control)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(religion, be control)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(religion, be used to keep population in control)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(religion, be used to keep population in control)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(politics, be control by big money)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(politics, be control by money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(politics, be control by money)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(politics, be control by money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(politics, be control by big money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(religion, be control)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(politics, be control by big money)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(religion, be used to keep population in control)