pollution: affect animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect animals 1.00
affect humans animals 0.95
affect animal life 0.90
be harmful to animals 0.89
be bad for animals 0.88
be dangerous to animals 0.87
kill animals 0.86
affect reptiles 0.86
affect creatures 0.86
affect wild horses 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, affect animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, kill animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(smog, affect animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, kill animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, kill animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pollution, affect animals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pollution, kill animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pollution, kill animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pollution, kill animals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be harmful to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, kill animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pollution, be harmful to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pollution, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(smog, affect animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(air pollution, kill animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for animals)