pollution: affect astronomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect astronomy 1.00
physics 0.77
be in life science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(problem, be in life science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, affect astronomy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(problem, be in life science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in life science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect astronomy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(problem, be in life science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect astronomy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(air pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pollution, affect astronomy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, affect astronomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be in life science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect astronomy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(pollution, affect astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be in life science)