pollution: affect wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect wildlife 1.00
be linked to wildlife 0.93
affect habitat 0.86
affect animals 0.85
affect habitats 0.84
affect giraffes habitat 0.83
affect biodiversity 0.82
affect forest ecosystem 0.82
affect animal life 0.82
affect habitats of sea life 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, affect animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(smog, affect animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pollution, affect habitat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect habitat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pollution, affect animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pollution, affect animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect habitat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pollution, affect habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(smog, affect animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)