pollution: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.97
be harmful to environment 0.86
be bad for world 0.82
be bad for people 0.81
be bad for water 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
spoil environment 0.79
be bad for air 0.78
be bad for earth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pollution, be good for environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pollution, be good for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be good for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pollution, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pollution, spoil environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for air)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for air)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for air)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pollution, spoil environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be harmful to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)