pollution: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good for environment 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
be bad for water 0.76
be bad for world 0.76
be in great lake important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(smog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pollution, be good for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pollution, be good for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pollution, be good for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(smog, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pollution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)