pollution: spoil environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
spoil environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.79
be good for environment 0.79
be harmful to environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pollution, spoil environment)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be good for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pollution, be good for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pollution, be good for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pollution, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pollution, be harmful to environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pollution, be harmful to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pollution, spoil environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pollution, spoil environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)