polycythemia: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.65
Siblings hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.36
, sickle cell anemia
Weight: 0.36
, hypothyroidism
Weight: 0.36
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality advantage 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality advantage)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, has quality advantage)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(polycythemia, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(polycythemia, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(polycythemia, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(polycythemia, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polycythemia, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(polycythemia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, has quality advantage)