polynomial: were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents simple function
Weight: 0.63
, function
Weight: 0.58
, sequence
Weight: 0.54
, expression
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.36
, configuration
Weight: 0.32
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.32
, recursion
Weight: 0.32
, stop codon
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature 1.00
were replaced with system of nomenclature 0.93
were replaced with system 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)