polysaccharide: be healthier than monosaccharides

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents compound
Weight: 0.65
, amino acid
Weight: 0.64
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.62
, macromolecule
Weight: 0.52
Siblings starch
Weight: 0.67
, maltose
Weight: 0.57
, sucrose
Weight: 0.54
, disaccharide
Weight: 0.46
, cysteine
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than monosaccharides 1.00
be better than monosaccharides 0.92
be harder than monosaccharides 0.86
be more difficult than monosaccharides 0.85
is healthy 0.82
get synthesised from monosaccharides 0.82
be more cariogenic than glucose 0.82
be worse than fructose 0.80
is non reducing sugars 0.80
be sweeter than lactose 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(disaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sucrose, be more cariogenic than glucose)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sucrose, be worse than fructose)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(disaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(disaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sucrose, be more cariogenic than glucose)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sucrose, be more cariogenic than glucose)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sucrose, be worse than fructose)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sucrose, be worse than fructose)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, be better than monosaccharides)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, be better than monosaccharides)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, be better than monosaccharides)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, be harder than monosaccharides)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, be harder than monosaccharides)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, be more difficult than monosaccharides)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, be harder than monosaccharides)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, get synthesised from monosaccharides)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, get synthesised from monosaccharides)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, be more difficult than monosaccharides)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(polysaccharide, is healthy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, be more difficult than monosaccharides)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be better than monosaccharides)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, get synthesised from monosaccharides)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be more difficult than monosaccharides)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, is healthy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, is healthy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be harder than monosaccharides)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(polysaccharide, is healthy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, get synthesised from monosaccharides)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(disaccharide, is non reducing sugars)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sucrose, be more cariogenic than glucose)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polysaccharide, be healthier than monosaccharides)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sucrose, be worse than fructose)