pom: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.55
, property
Weight: 0.44
, material
Weight: 0.43
, word
Weight: 0.43
, brand
Weight: 0.42
Siblings chihuahua
Weight: 0.31
, terrier
Weight: 0.31
, dachshund
Weight: 0.31
, poodle
Weight: 0.31
, pug
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
hate australia 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(property, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pom, be in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(property, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(property, be in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(property, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pom, be in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pom, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pom, hate australia)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(pom, hate australia)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pom, hate australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pom, hate australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pom, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pom, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(property, be in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(pom, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(property, be in australia)