pond: be full of duck and fish

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.65
, fresh water
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.62
Siblings creek
Weight: 0.36
, river
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be full of duck and fish 1.00
be used to fish in 0.87
be used to fish 0.87
be used to keep fish 0.83
be habitat for fish 0.79
be used to bird to live in 0.78
be full of water 0.77
be used to frog to live in 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(creek, be used to fish in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to fish)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to bird to live in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(creek, be used to fish in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(creek, be used to fish in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(river, be used to fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(river, be used to fish)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(marsh, be used to bird to live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to keep fish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pond, be used to fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pond, be full of water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pond, be used to keep fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to fish)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to keep fish)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pond, be used to fish)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pond, be used to keep fish)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pond, be full of water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pond, be full of water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(river, be used to fish)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(creek, be used to fish in)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)