pool: be at backyard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, pond
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32
, competition
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at backyard 1.00
be at neighbor house 0.79
be at garden 0.78
be used to have water garden 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(deck, be at backyard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fountain, be at garden)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to have water garden)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deck, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(deck, be at backyard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pond, be used to have water garden)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to have water garden)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fountain, be at garden)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fountain, be at garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pool, be at backyard)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at neighbor house)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pool, be at neighbor house)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pool, be at neighbor house)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pool, be at neighbor house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pool, be at backyard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(deck, be at backyard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pond, be used to have water garden)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at backyard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fountain, be at garden)