pool: be at waterfall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, pond
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32
, competition
Weight: 0.32
, picnic table
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at waterfall 1.00
be at lake 0.76
be at pond 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pool, be at waterfall)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pool, be at waterfall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at pond)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at lake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(pool, be at waterfall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pool, be at waterfall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pool, be at waterfall)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)