pool: have screens in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents swimming pool
Weight: 0.86
, event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, clo
Weight: 0.42
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.33
, synchronized swimming
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have screens in florida 1.00
be in florida 0.89
be in florida small 0.87
be cold in florida 0.86
be covered in florida 0.85
be screened in in florida 0.84
be screened in florida 0.84
be in florida indoors 0.82
be enclosed in florida 0.82
be fenced in in florida 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pool, have screens in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pool, be fenced in in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pool, be fenced in in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pool, be cold in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pool, be covered in florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(pool, be cold in florida)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pool, be in florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pool, be fenced in in florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(pool, be covered in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pool, be cold in florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pool, be fenced in in florida)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pool, be cold in florida)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pool, be covered in florida)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pool, be covered in florida)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pool, be enclosed in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)