poor people: be more generous than rich

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents many people
Weight: 0.75
, most people
Weight: 0.66
, other people
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.60
, lack
Weight: 0.60
Siblings redneck
Weight: 0.44
, young people
Weight: 0.40
, business people
Weight: 0.38
, older people
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more generous than rich 1.00
be less intelligent than rich people 0.84
be more involved than rich people 0.84
be more fertile than rich people 0.83
hate much rich people 0.82
be just as happy as rich 0.82
have more children than rich people 0.82
become rich 0.82
be in america fatter than rich people 0.81
hate rich people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(poor people, be more fertile than rich people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(poor people, be more fertile than rich people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be more fertile than rich people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(poor people, hate much rich people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(poor people, hate much rich people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(poor people, hate much rich people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(poor people, be less intelligent than rich people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(poor people, be less intelligent than rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(poor people, be more involved than rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be less intelligent than rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(poor people, be in america fatter than rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(poor people, hate rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(poor people, be in america fatter than rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(poor people, hate rich people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in america fatter than rich people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(poor people, be more involved than rich people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(poor people, hate rich people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be more involved than rich people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(poor people, have more children than rich people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(poor people, be more fertile than rich people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(poor people, hate much rich people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(poor people, hate rich people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(poor people, be in america fatter than rich people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(poor people, be less intelligent than rich people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poor people, be more involved than rich people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(poor people, have more children than rich people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be more generous than rich)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poor people, be more generous than rich)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(poor people, be more generous than rich)