poor people: be treated unfairly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents many people
Weight: 0.75
, most people
Weight: 0.66
, other people
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.60
, lack
Weight: 0.60
Siblings redneck
Weight: 0.44
, young people
Weight: 0.40
, business people
Weight: 0.38
, older people
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated unfairly 1.00
is treated badly 0.79
were treated like 0.77
were treated 0.77
were treated in 1800s 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(poor people, be treated unfairly)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poor people, is treated badly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated like)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poor people, is treated badly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated like)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(poor people, were treated like)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated like)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(poor people, is treated badly)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(poor people, is treated badly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be treated unfairly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(poor people, be treated unfairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poor people, be treated unfairly)