pop music: be better than country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than country 1.00
be better than music 0.85
be better than rock 0.83
be have better income in other countries 0.81
be have better income in countries 0.80
get worse 0.80
be better than rap 0.79
be have better income 0.76
be more popular than rock 0.76
be better than classical music 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than rap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(country music, be better than rap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(country music, be better than rap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than country)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pop music, get worse)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pop music, get worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pop music, get worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pop music, get worse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than music)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rap)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rap)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than rap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than music)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than music)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than classical music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(country music, be better than rap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pop music, be better than country)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)