pop music: be better than rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than rock 1.00
be more popular than rock 0.93
be better than music 0.87
be better than rap 0.84
be better than country 0.83
be better than classical music 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rock)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than rap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(art, be better than music)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(country music, be better than rap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(country music, be better than rap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than rock)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pop music, be more popular than rock)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than music)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than rap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rap)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than music)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than music)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than classical music)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pop music, be better than classical music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(country music, be better than rap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pop music, be better than rock)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(art, be better than music)