pop music: be have better income

Property	Similarity
be have better income	1.00
be have income	0.96
be have better income in countries	0.94
be have better income in other countries	0.93
be have income in countries	0.90
be have income in other countries	0.90
be better than country	0.76

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in countries)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in countries)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in countries)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in other countries)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in other countries)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in other countries)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in countries)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in other countries)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income in other countries)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(pop music, be have income in other countries)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(pop music, be have income in other countries)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(pop music, be have income in countries)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(pop music, be have income in countries)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(pop music, be have income)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income in countries)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(pop music, be have income in countries)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(pop music, be have income in other countries)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than country)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(pop music, be better than country)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(pop music, be have income)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(pop music, be better than country)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than country)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(pop music, be have better income) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(pop music, be have income)

Parents	music Weight: 0.71 , rock music Weight: 0.67 , art Weight: 0.62 , media Weight: 0.61
Siblings	classical music Weight: 0.74 , country music Weight: 0.70 , rap music Weight: 0.59 , rock n roll Weight: 0.57

pop music: be have better income

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible