pop music: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is best)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is best)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(country music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rock music, is best)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(country music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rap music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rap music, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(classical music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rock n roll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pop music, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pop music, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rap music, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock n roll, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is best)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)