popcorn: have more calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.36
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.36
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more calories 1.00
is more calories 0.99
have less calories 0.99
have calories 0.99
is less calories 0.98
is calories 0.97
have many calories 0.97
be high in calories 0.95
lose calories 0.95
have more calories unpopped 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pretzel, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(popcorn, lose calories)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(popcorn, lose calories)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pretzel, be high in calories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)