population: be at inhabit city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, economy
Weight: 0.33
, society
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at inhabit city 1.00
be at area with person inhabit it 0.93
be at populate area 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(society, be at populate area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(society, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(society, be at populate area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(population, be at inhabit city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(population, be at area with person inhabit it)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(population, be at area with person inhabit it)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(population, be at area with person inhabit it)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(population, be at area with person inhabit it)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(population, be at inhabit city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(population, be at inhabit city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(population, be at inhabit city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(society, be at populate area)