porcelain: was important to chinese

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings vase
Weight: 0.35
, enamel
Weight: 0.34
, pottery
Weight: 0.34
, teapot
Weight: 0.33
, decoration
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to chinese 1.00
was important in china 0.80
was important in ancient china 0.79
was used in china 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pottery, was important in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in ancient china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(porcelain, was used in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(porcelain, was used in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was used in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was used in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in china)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in ancient china)