pork: be best kind of meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best kind of meat 1.00
be worst meat eat 0.89
be called other meat 0.88
is other meat 0.88
be called meat 0.87
is meat 0.87
be considered meat 0.86
be called other white meat 0.85
is other white meat 0.85
is dirty meat 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, be called meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, is meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pork, be called other meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pork, be considered meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, is meat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pork, be called meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, be considered meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pork, is other white meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pork, be called other meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called other white meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pork, is meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pork, be called meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pork, be called other meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pork, be considered meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called other meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(pork, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be considered meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dirty meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pork, is dirty meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pork, is dirty meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pork, is dirty meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pork, be called other white meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pork, is other white meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pork, be called other white meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pork, is other white meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pork, be called other white meat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pork, is other white meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be best kind of meat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)