pork: has quality sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sin 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, has quality sin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, has quality sin)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, has quality sin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pork, has quality sin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pork, has quality sin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pork, has quality sin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pork, has quality sin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, has quality sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ground beef, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pork, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)