pornography: be at internet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, image
Weight: 0.62
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.60
, web site
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, drug addict
Weight: 0.33
, horror movie
Weight: 0.33
, web
Weight: 0.33
, web browser
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet 1.00
be a part of internet 0.96
wants to go on internet 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web site, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pornography, be at internet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(addiction, wants to go on internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pornography, be at internet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(addiction, wants to go on internet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web site, be at internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(addiction, wants to go on internet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(web site, be at internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(web, be a part of internet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web site, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pornography, be at internet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(addiction, wants to go on internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pornography, be at internet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(web, be a part of internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(web, be a part of internet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pornography, be at internet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pornography, be at internet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(web site, be at internet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(addiction, wants to go on internet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(web, be a part of internet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(web site, be at internet)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(pornography, be at internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(addiction, wants to go on internet)