pornstar: has physical part style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part style 1.00
have bad style 0.88
has physical part skin 0.78
has physical part balls 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pornstar, has physical part style)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, have bad style)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pornstar, has physical part skin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pornstar, have bad style)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pornstar, has physical part skin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pornstar, have bad style)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pornstar, has physical part skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pornstar, has physical part balls)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pornstar, have bad style)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pornstar, has physical part balls)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part balls)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pornstar, has physical part balls)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, has physical part style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pornstar, has physical part style)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornstar, has physical part style)