pornstar: is paid less

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid less 1.00
is paid 0.92
be paid 0.91
get paid 0.89
be paid more than male pornstars 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(model, get paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stripper, be paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid less)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(stripper, be paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(model, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(stripper, be paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stripper, be paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(model, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pornstar, is paid less)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pornstar, be paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pornstar, is paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pornstar, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pornstar, is paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pornstar, be paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pornstar, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pornstar, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid less)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stripper, be paid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(model, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stripper, be paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(model, get paid)