portal: be rated t 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents website
Weight: 0.70
, web site
Weight: 0.66
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, web
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.70
, search engine
Weight: 0.68
, yahoo
Weight: 0.64
, marketplace
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated t 2 1.00
is 2 rated e10 0.88
is 2 12 rating 0.77
is 2 e10 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(portal, be rated t 2)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(portal, is 2 rated e10)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(portal, is 2 rated e10)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(portal, is 2 12 rating)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(portal, is 2 e10)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(portal, is 2 rated e10)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(portal, is 2 12 rating)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(portal, is 2 e10)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(portal, is 2 rated e10)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(portal, is 2 12 rating)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(portal, is 2 e10)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(portal, is 2 12 rating)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(portal, is 2 e10)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(portal, be rated t 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(portal, be rated t 2)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(portal, be rated t 2)