porter: has state station

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.63
, style
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.60
, beer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lager
Weight: 0.40
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.35
, janitor
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state station 1.00
is square station 0.87
is station deep 0.86
is square station deep 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(porter, has state station)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(porter, is square station)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(porter, is station deep)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(porter, is square station deep)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(porter, is square station)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(porter, is square station)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(porter, is station deep)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(porter, is station deep)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(porter, is square station deep)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(porter, is square station deep)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(porter, is station deep)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(porter, is square station deep)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(porter, is square station)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(porter, has state station)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(porter, has state station) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(porter, has state station)