portfolio: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	collection Weight: 0.58 , tool Weight: 0.57 , service Weight: 0.56 , solution Weight: 0.56
Siblings	internet service provider Weight: 0.31 , operating system Weight: 0.31 , leverage Weight: 0.31 , management Weight: 0.31 , service station Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
is quality	0.91
has quality use	0.88
has quality worth	0.85
has quality system	0.84
is good important	0.84
is great	0.81
has quality resource	0.79
be good for company	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(collection, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(collection, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(management, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(collection, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(leverage, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(management, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(management, has quality system)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(management, is good important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(leverage, be good for company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(portfolio, is quality)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(portfolio, is quality)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(portfolio, is quality)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality use)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality use)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, is quality)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality use)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality use)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(portfolio, has quality resource)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(portfolio, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(management, has quality system)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(leverage, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(leverage, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(collection, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(portfolio, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is great)