portugal: was interested in exploration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.66
, south america
Weight: 0.63
, team
Weight: 0.59
, european union
Weight: 0.59
Siblings argentina
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, europe
Weight: 0.36
, brazil
Weight: 0.36
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was interested in exploration 1.00
be important to exploration 0.94
was used exploration 0.93
was leader in exploration 0.90
was pushing for exploration 0.89
was successful during age of explorations 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(portugal, was used exploration)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portugal, was used exploration)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(portugal, was used exploration)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was used exploration)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration)