portugal: was successful during age of explorations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.66
, south america
Weight: 0.63
, team
Weight: 0.59
, european union
Weight: 0.59
Siblings argentina
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, europe
Weight: 0.36
, brazil
Weight: 0.36
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successful during age of explorations 1.00
was successful during age 0.80
was interested in exploration 0.79
was used exploration 0.79
be important to exploration 0.78
was pushing for exploration 0.78
was leader in exploration 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(portugal, was used exploration)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(portugal, was used exploration)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(portugal, was used exploration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(portugal, was interested in exploration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(portugal, was interested in exploration)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(portugal, was interested in exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(portugal, was pushing for exploration)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(portugal, be important to exploration)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was interested in exploration)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was leader in exploration)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was used exploration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(portugal, was successful during age of explorations)