position: be in management demanding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.63
, authority
Weight: 0.61
, dimension
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings third base
Weight: 0.72
, spot
Weight: 0.71
, post
Weight: 0.67
, shortstop
Weight: 0.65
, standing
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in management demanding 1.00
be in management more demanding 0.99
be in management 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(position, be in management demanding)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(position, be in management more demanding)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(position, be in management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(position, be in management more demanding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(position, be in management more demanding)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(position, be in management more demanding)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(position, be in management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(position, be in management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(position, be in management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(position, be in management demanding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(position, be in management demanding)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(position, be in management demanding)