possum: be pest in zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents marsupial
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, animal
Weight: 0.52
Siblings sugar glider
Weight: 0.56
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, wallaby
Weight: 0.37
, kangaroo
Weight: 0.37
, opossum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pest in zealand 1.00
be pest in new zealand 0.99
have in zealand pests 0.95
have in new zealand pests 0.93
be considered pest 0.89
has state pest 0.88
be in zealand 0.84
be problem in zealand 0.84
be bad in zealand 0.83
be in new zealand 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(possum, be considered pest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(possum, be considered pest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(possum, has state pest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(possum, be in new zealand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(possum, has state pest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(possum, be considered pest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(possum, be in new zealand)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(possum, has state pest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(possum, be in new zealand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(possum, be considered pest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(possum, be in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)