poster: were problem for slaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.60
, way
Weight: 0.59
, drawing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings photograph
Weight: 0.34
, photo
Weight: 0.33
, cartoon
Weight: 0.33
, old man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were problem for slaves 1.00
were problem for slaves in cities 0.95
were problem for runaway slaves 0.92
were problem for slaves in northern cities 0.91
were problem for runaway slaves in cities 0.90
were problem for runaway slaves in northern cities 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for slaves)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves in cities)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for slaves in cities)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves in cities)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves in northern cities)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in cities)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for slaves in northern cities)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in cities)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves in northern cities)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for runaway slaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in northern cities)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in cities)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for slaves in cities)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in northern cities)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(poster, were problem for runaway slaves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in northern cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for slaves in northern cities)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in cities)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(poster, were problem for runaway slaves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for runaway slaves in northern cities)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for runaway slaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(poster, were problem for slaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(poster, were problem for slaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poster, were problem for slaves)