pot: be decorative

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.33
, cup
Weight: 0.33
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.33
, spoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be decorative 1.00
be use for decoration 0.84
be wood metal or plastic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pot, be decorative)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pot, be decorative)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pot, be decorative)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pot, be use for decoration)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pot, be use for decoration)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pot, be use for decoration)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pot, be use for decoration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pot, be decorative)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pot, be decorative)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pot, be decorative)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be wood metal or plastic)