pot: has flower

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.33
, cup
Weight: 0.33
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.33
, spoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has flower 1.00
be used to plant flower in 0.89
be at container garden 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(container, be at container garden)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pot, has flower)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(container, be at container garden)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(container, be at container garden)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(container, be at container garden)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pot, has flower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pot, has flower)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(pot, be used to plant flower in)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pot, be used to plant flower in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pot, has flower)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pot, has flower)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(container, be at container garden)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pot, has flower)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(container, be at container garden)