potato chip: be bad for cholesterol

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for cholesterol 1.00
be bad for diabetics 0.83
be bad for gout 0.79
be high in fat 0.77
be high in oxalates 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for diabetics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for gout)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for gout)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for gout)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for diabetics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for diabetics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for diabetics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for gout)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be high in oxalates)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(potato chip, be high in oxalates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for diabetics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be high in oxalates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(potato chip, be high in oxalates)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be high in fat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato chip, be high in fat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be high in fat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(potato chip, be high in fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for diabetics)