potato chip: be bad for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for us 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for dogs 0.79
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chip, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for us)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato chip, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(potato chip, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(potato chip, be bad for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chip, be bad for dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(potato chip, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)