potato chip: be eat with pizza

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chip
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, food
Weight: 0.71
, product
Weight: 0.68
Siblings apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, onion
Weight: 0.36
, apple juice
Weight: 0.36
, banana
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eat with pizza 1.00
be at pizza 0.96
be eat 0.85
be used to eat 0.84
be eat from dish 0.83
be good to eat 0.82
be eat by person 0.82
wants to eat 0.81
be used to snack 0.80
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(onion, be at pizza)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(banana, be eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(banana, be used to eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(banana, be good to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(onion, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(onion, be at pizza)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(banana, be good to eat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(banana, be good to eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(banana, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(banana, be used to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(banana, be eat)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(banana, be eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(onion, be at pizza)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(banana, be eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(banana, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(banana, be good to eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)