potato: be served with steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served with steak 1.00
be served in bowls 0.80
was named fries 0.79
be typically served 0.79
is cooked 0.78
is cooked twice 0.78
be called fries 0.77
be more expensive than burgers 0.77
is salad 0.77
is fried twice 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(potato, be served with steak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(potato, be served with steak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(potato salad, is salad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(french fry, was named fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(potato, be served with steak)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato, is salad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(potato, is cooked)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(potato, is salad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(potato, be served with steak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(potato salad, is salad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(french fry, was named fries)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(potato, be served with steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)