potato: has sweetness sweet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has sweetness sweet 1.00
taste sweet 0.91
be called sweet 0.90
become sweet 0.86
have word sweet 0.85
be sweet boiling 0.83
is crunchy 0.78
is yummy 0.78
taste good freshly cooked 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, have word sweet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, be called sweet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, have word sweet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, have word sweet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(potato, be called sweet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, taste sweet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, be called sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(potato, taste sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(potato, be called sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(potato, become sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(potato, become sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(potato, taste sweet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(potato, have word sweet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(potato, become sweet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(potato, be sweet boiling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(potato, have word sweet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(potato, be sweet boiling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(potato, be sweet boiling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(potato, be called sweet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(potato, have word sweet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(potato, have word sweet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(potato, become sweet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(potato, be sweet boiling)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato, is yummy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, is yummy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(potato, is yummy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sweet potato, have word sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)